Voting districtsDA 3ANC 1darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC 44.7%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout53.6%

Voters on the roll3 452

South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)

checked 02:18Latest results

Voting station

Lingomso Primary School27 Station Road Tulbagh TulbaghTulbagh, Tulbagh

Ward ballot ? · 1 825 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress81544.7%
DADemocratic Alliance38421.0%
PAPatriotic Alliance30616.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1779.7%
SACPSouth African Communist Party452.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus442.4%
CCCNational Coloured Congress150.8%
DAWIDemocratic Association of Witzenberg Independence60.3%
WPWitzenberg Party60.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party60.3%
GOOD50.3%
ARAAfrica Restoration Alliance50.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania20.1%
PDMPeople's Democratic Movement20.1%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party20.1%
WIDWitzenberg Onafhanklike Demokratiese Party20.1%
AWEH!Aboriginal Warriors 4 Economic Hope!20.1%
ICOSAIndependent Civic Organisation of South Africa10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 1 ?

Tulbagh

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 1 850 · spoilt 25 · special votes 0 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (1 850 of 3 452). The IEC publishes 53.8%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 822 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Witzenberg's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 08 Nov 2026, 18:21 SAST.