Tent in Jakes Gerwel Drive

Get the app
Voting district 97091220: DA 47.3% (PR ballot)Voting district 97091231: DA 59.2% (PR ballot)Voting district 97091242: DA 65.7% (PR ballot)Voting district 97091253: DA 46.8% (PR ballot)Voting district 97091602: DA 56.9% (PR ballot)Voting district 97093435: ANC 53.7% (PR ballot)Judah Worship Centre (VD 97091220)Strandfontein High School (VD 97091231)GOOD Hope Christian Centre (VD 97091242)Apostolic Faith Mission Strandfontein (VD 97091253)Refuge Fellowship Ministry (VD 97091602)Tent in Jakes Gerwel Drive (VD 97093435)
Voting districtsDA 5ANC 1darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 50.4%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout33.9%
Voters on the roll1 604
South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)
checked Latest results

Voting station

Tent in Jakes Gerwel DriveJakes Gerwel Drive Siqalo Mitchells PlainSiqalo, Mitchells Plain

Ward ballot ? · 579 valid votes

ESP areas in this voting district · 1 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 544 · spoilt 13 · special votes 19 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (544 of 1 604). The IEC publishes 36.8%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this voting district is 36.78%; its own counts give 33.92% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 08 Nov 2026, 20:21 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it