Voting districtsIFP 3MKP 1darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

IFP 66.5%down 3.0 pts from 69.5% in 2021

Most party (PR) votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout63.1%

Voters on the roll1 079

South Africa · Counting23 693 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.9%)

checked 11:56Latest results

Voting station

Ngotweni Primary SchoolN2 Mfekayi Area Mtubatuba Mpukunyoni TribalMtubatuba, Mpukunyoni Tribal

PR ballot ? · 659 valid votes

IFPInkatha Freedom Party43866.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party7912.0%
ANCAfrican National Congress385.8%
SIPSiyanqoba Independent Party253.8%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa203.0%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party81.2%
KZNIKzn Independence81.2%
AICAfrican Independent Congress71.1%
NFPNational Freedom Party50.8%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement50.8%
DADemocratic Alliance40.6%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement40.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters30.5%
I.L.PIzwe Lethu Party30.5%
NACOLNational Community Liberation20.3%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress20.3%
GJDPGods Justice and Development Party20.3%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement10.2%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania10.2%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party10.2%
SACPSouth African Communist Party10.2%
NPANational Peoples Ambassadors10.2%
SDPService Delivery Party10.2%

ESP areas in this voting district · 1 ?

Mfekayi

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 681 · spoilt 22 · special votes 47 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (681 of 1 079). The IEC publishes 63.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 438 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 0: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Inkosi uMtubatuba's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 09 Nov 2026, 05:20 SAST.