Voting districtsANC 3SACP 1darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC 33.2%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout51.7%

Voters on the roll1 461

South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)

checked 00:32Latest results

Voting station

Marematlou Secondary School4545 Stilte Park Meloding VirginiaMeloding, Virginia

Ward ballot ? · 740 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress24633.2%
SACPSouth African Communist Party18124.5%
DADemocratic Alliance11815.9%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa9012.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters557.4%
ActionSA101.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus50.7%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party50.7%
AICAfrican Independent Congress50.7%
APCAfrican People's Convention50.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance40.5%
URFUnited Residents Front30.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement30.4%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party30.4%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party10.1%
AACAfrican Alliance Congress10.1%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation10.1%
FISAFreedom in South Africa10.1%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress10.1%
ALMAfrican Liberation Movement10.1%
VFCVoice for Change10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 1 ?

Meloding

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 755 · spoilt 6 · special votes 89 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (755 of 1 461). The IEC publishes 51.7%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Matjhabeng's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 16:50 SAST.