No majority
ANC 43 of 90 seats · 46 for a majority
Most ward votes: ANC 47.8% · down 16.7 pts from 64.5% in 2021
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 187 853 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress89 77447.8%
DADemocratic Alliance28 63715.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters21 65611.5%- SDPService Delivery Party15 4738.2%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party8 7694.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus7 2803.9%- SACPSouth African Communist Party4 9722.6%
ActionSA3 7882.0%- IndependentIndependent candidates1 6940.9%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement8920.5%- MYRMbombela Yebahlali Residence7300.4%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party7210.4%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement6390.3%
- LABOURLabour Party of South Africa6270.3%
APCAfrican People's Convention3930.2%
URFUnited Residents Front3790.2%- BTCPBarberton Community Party3160.2%
- GJDPGods Justice and Development Party3030.2%
SUNSizwe Ummah Nation2300.1%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania2180.1%
UATUnited Africans Transformation1870.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement810.0%
PAPatriotic Alliance480.0%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party300.0%
NFPNational Freedom Party160.0%
Council seats · 90 ?
- African National Congress39 ward · 4 PR43
- Democratic Alliance5 ward · 9 PR14
- Economic Freedom Fighters1 ward · 10 PR11
- Service Delivery Party0 ward · 8 PR8
- Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 4 PR4
- Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 4 PR4
- South African Communist Party0 ward · 2 PR2
- ActionSA0 ward · 2 PR2
- African Christian Democratic Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in City of Mbombela ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 45
- Ward 1ANC 44.3%
- Ward 2ANC 52.8%
- Ward 3ANC 56.1%
- Ward 4ANC 46.5%
- Ward 5ANC 65.3%
- Ward 6ANC 54.9%
- Ward 7ANC 74.3%
- Ward 8ANC 43.4%
- Ward 9ANC 65.3%
- Ward 10ANC 59.3%
- Ward 11ANC 60.8%
- Ward 12ANC 40.8%
- Ward 13ANC 43.9%
- Ward 14ANC 35.5%
- Ward 15DA 54.9%
- Ward 16DA 36.3%
- Ward 17DA 64.4%
- Ward 18ANC 41.8%
- Ward 19ANC 48.6%
- Ward 20ANC 50.9%
- Ward 21ANC 56.1%
- Ward 22ANC 63.3%
- Ward 23ANC 63.2%
- Ward 24ANC 54.1%
- Ward 25EFF 43.8%
- Ward 26ANC 56.3%
- Ward 27ANC 51.2%
- Ward 28ANC 64.8%
- Ward 29ANC 57.9%
- Ward 30DA 57.4%
- Ward 31ANC 53.5%
- Ward 32ANC 63.0%
- Ward 33ANC 51.0%
- Ward 34ANC 53.7%
- Ward 35ANC 57.8%
- Ward 36ANC 60.8%
- Ward 37ANC 46.3%
- Ward 38ANC 39.4%
- Ward 39ANC 56.9%
- Ward 40ANC 56.4%
- Ward 41ANC 51.3%
- Ward 42DA 36.7%
- Ward 43ANC 42.2%
- Ward 44ANC 60.7%
- Ward 45ANC 51.2%
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 25 135 · All 285 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 285 voting districts here (191 232 of 362 820). The IEC publishes 53.1%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1577 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4718); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 559 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1563); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1595); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1222); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2647 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7884); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5048); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1906 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5688); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1631); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1024); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1617 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4918); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 717 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1996); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 657 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2054); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (782); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9481); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 962 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2931); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (466); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6503); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 905 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2748); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (946); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2883 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8601); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 499 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1496); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (589); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4473); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2548); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (761); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2063 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6123); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1377); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1990 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6010); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1209); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1003); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (801); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (571); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (690); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3642); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 845 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2538); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1233); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (792); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (409); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4558); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 932 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2703); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (754); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (714); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2756 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8323); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1969 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5880); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 821 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2528); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1840); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1322); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1071); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10063); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3959); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 811 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2505); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (558); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1888 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5609); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3997); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 594 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1906); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 584 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1709); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1096); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (629); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12299); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1733); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6304); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 878 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2612); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1738); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 389 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (856); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (842); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6599); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 678 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1941); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1413); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1000); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (897); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (725); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1880 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5707); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 627 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1861); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1083); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (707); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2084 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 471 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1429); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1409); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (527); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6886); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1636); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1215); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 804 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2390); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7724); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 816 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2473); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2532 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7423); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6788); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (856); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (880); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8408); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3755); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1091); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (677); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6566); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 638 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1840); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1492); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (942); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (889); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7469); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (806); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7689); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 953 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2843); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7957); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 774 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2428); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 770 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2331); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1847 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5480); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 711 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1026); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (547); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6400); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (855); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (852); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (564); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6390); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 518 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1483); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1299); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1207); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (937); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (438); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3335); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (397); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2417 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1228); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1072); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (975); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (871); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (524); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2044 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1382); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (842); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5816); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 739 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 570 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1757); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1226); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (850); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4017); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2477); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1293); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (782); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6923); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1944); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (966); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7272); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 678 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6912); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1663); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 476 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1444); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3827); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3606); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (715); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5972); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6418); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1727 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5201); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1038); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (981); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (969); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (990); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 08 Nov 2026, 19:14 SAST.